Skip to content

Interesting legal stuff

November 5, 2007

This is interesting. On the one hand (and I hate to say it) Ordinary Preston does have a point. Chantelle wouldn’t have a story to sell if they had stayed happily married. So doesn’t he deserve a percentage of her earnings from these stories? But then (and this has been making my head hurt a bit) who gets what out of *this* story.

Of course, many peeps didn’t believe their marriage was true in the first place (even more reason for him to have his share), but it does get you thinking about the Mills/McCartney divorce. Should Macca claim half Heather’s recent PR stint fee?

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: